on longing
What is longing? In Seminar 11, Lacan writes that desire is "to lack what one has". Desire resembles longing; it must, although of course it is not the same. Longing: the word has distance contained in itself. Distance between the lover and the beloved is the originating point for anticipation, for desire; the lover longs for her beloved, she considers the value of what is made distant from herself.
Most simply, longing is desire for what is radically exterior; i.e., not the self. I cannot long for myself because I am never separate from it. Longing requires separation. If I am longing for my self, it is for a self I believe I have lost, a self which has become fragmented, articulated, which no longer belongs to my whole (my perceived whole). The subject who is paranoid or schizophrenic may be able to long for her self; her attachment to that self is fragmented in its own being. In a split subject this self-longing is easy to understand. In subjects who are more whole than fragmented, longing is directed outwards, toward the other, the beloved. What is not part of the self, what I love, I want to become part of my self. Longing, then, is linked to possession: I want you means also I want to own you. I want you for my own. You belong to me. Or with me: the feeling is essentially similar.
The function of longing is a paradox. It is necessary and it is intolerable. Barthes: this can't go on! is the cry of the lover away from the assurance of the love of her beloved. And yet it must go on: longing for the other is inescapable. I can never be fully with my beloved, if for no other reason than that of our separate skins, separate bodies. So I continue longing for just a bit more closeness, always just a bit more, and cannot attain it. But it is this tension between what I think I want and what I can ever attain which makes it possible for love to continue: if ever I were able to be as close to my beloved as I think I would like, I might lose interest. But the variable is not a constant variable; it shifts, and where I believed myself to be approaching the one I love I find in fact that there remain many unknown, even unknowable, reaches. A self-sustaining system.
Longing is the expression of desire for the ideal relation, which is only ever approached. Approach is anticipation, it is a provisional 'yes'--its orientation is towards the places where the beloved could be, in the future. It anticipates in both senses, then: in the sense of waiting, and in the sense of arriving before the other arrives. In this way it is both respectful and dismissive of the being and desires of the other; it says, I will wait for you, I hope you will come, and, simultaneously, I expect that you will be in this place (where we can understand 'place' to mean a physical location, certainly, but also a state, a kind of being)--a limiting thought, perhaps.
But, luckily, the role of the lover and the beloved in relation to one another is always one of gentle, loving transgression of the limits of being and of understanding.
But, luckily, the role of the lover and the beloved in relation to one another is always one of gentle, loving transgression of the limits of being and of understanding.





7 Comments:
hi eireann.
i love this post. i have been thinking of this word too lately. i've been quiet but i'm always reading. :) you give me so much to think about. xo
And with the longing comes the reaching, if not to attain then to qauntify the distance.
I've enjoyed all your readings. How do you come upon them?
I love the words of Kahlil Gibran in the book The Prophet:
"But let there be spaces in your togetherness,
And let the winds of the heavens dance between you.
Love one another but make not a bond of love:
Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
Fill each other's cup but drink not from one cup.
Give one another of your bread but eat not from the same loaf.
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but let each one of you be alone,
Even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music."
Somehow to me this embodies love and longing - desiring to be with a person, but yet at the same time, desiring to allow that person to be their own person and not to simply absorb them into yourself - perhaps you could say that love and longing are sometimes conflicting for that reason - that longing desires to absorb the other, while love desires to nourish and see it grow into its own. And the balance is to be together, but to hold space between yourselves, so that you can both be with the other to a degree, and yet be and grow into yourself at the same time, to a degree (because obviously being close with someone will effect how you grow).
I think there also is an element of maintaining mystery - that what you don't know is intriguing to you, and you desire to know what you don't know already... and so, as you said, keeping space between yourselves also sustains the desire for closeness.
It's a question I've never really thought of in exactly these terms, but, would longing, unchecked, simply destroy through absorption? Would it stifle and choke out the other in an attempt to be closer?
Thanks for posting these thoughts.
"is fada liom uaim í..."
(from that song, "Molly na gCuach Ní Chuilleanáin")
eireann,
this is a beautiful post. are you familiar with susan stewart's book "on longing"? i think you'd really like it.
shari, glad you're out there. sometimes it feels very quiet indeed, but i'm learning to understand that quiet. also glad the writing speaks to you. x
nikkita: exactly. anticipation is what i'm calling the stae that is the reaction to the longing, which includes the feeling of movement towards the (unattainable?) beloved.
as far as finding my readings, i really just scan lists of books or go to the library and look in the sections i think will be useful, and if i see something interesting i pick it up and read a few pages, and take it home and read a bit more...and what's useful and good i continue with. i can make a list of what i've been reading if you'd like to see it.
melancholic: really that seems to me to be the only possible way to be with someone--being with is always a contradiction, since we cannot be fully with. so being-with becomes more about one's own being-with than the being-with of the other? i think. i mean that it is my responsibility to be with my other as much as i can (i.e., as fully as i can) but i can't control or ever even really know how much with me he/she is. i want to write about the difference between belonging and possession, too, which i think might be interesting.
i think unchecked longing is obsession, which is close kin to possession. belonging, for me, lies nearer to love.
james, go raibh maith agat!
julie, i do know that book! i was reading it this fall, but it was recalled to the university library, alas.
thank you all!
Yeah, I totally agree that the primary (if not only) responsibility one has in the relationship is to be-with and not to try to force or coerce the other to be-with... to simply give and receive what is given, rather than to attempt to take. Maybe it's actually more about each person making themselves approachable rather than each trying to approach the other... well, I think they tend to be simultaneous, really, as making yourself (your real self) approachable seems to also be approaching...
belonging as opposed to possession would be a really interesting topic... looking forward to your thoughts :)
Post a Comment
<< Home